who is exporting arms to current regions in conflict

In their interpretation of US and international arms export rules and whether US presidentialĪdministrations therefore have considerable legal authority over theirĬonventional arms export decision-making, as well as considerable flexibility While the United States is legally bound to implement mandatory United NationsĪrms embargoes and to act in a manner consistent with international law, itįaces relatively few arms-export specific multilateral obligations.

The second section provides an overview of US international obligations. The executive branch can therefore shape arms transfers around In practice, Congressional oversight has been weak The AECA also positions Congress as a check onĮxecutive decision-making. The AECA directs export decisions to take the outbreak orĮscalation of conflict into account.

The centerpiece of the US arms export control system is the 1976Īrms Export Control Act (AECA), which gives the president authority over armsĮxports and imports. System meaningfully restrains arms supplies to conflict zones. What has been less clear –Īnd increasingly the topic of political debate – is whether its export control Supplier in the world, with a global customer base. Today, the United States continues to be the largest arms Instability, while also accounting for US economic interests and national Tasked in the 1970s with restraining arms supplies to regions of conflict and Arms Exports,” by Jennifer Erickson (World Peace Foundation, March 23, 2022).Below is from the executive summary. The World Peace Foundation is pleased to announce the publication of “On the Front Lines: Conflict Zones and U.S.

Who is exporting arms to current regions in conflict